The case, Garland v. Cargill, will test language related to what action is actually required by a shooter to increase a given weapon’s rate of fire. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the Fifth Circuit and the Sixth Circuit have all come to differing conclusions regarding the ban.
Estimated reading time: 0 minutes, 27 seconds
'Bump Stocks' Getting Day in SCOTUS as Circuit Courts Disagree Over Ban
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case that will determine if “bump stocks,” which enable semi-automatic weapons to dramatically increase their rate of fire, are legal. So reports Vox.
Latest from Progressive Law Practice
- California Drivers No Longer Need To Answer Cop’s Question
- Iowa Ban On LGBTQ+ Books Largely Blocked Ahead Of Enactment
- Michael Cohen's Legal Defense Included Non-existent Cases Invented By Google Bard: Report
- Hershey Sued For False Advertising Over 'Cute' Holiday Candy
- Terms Of Bombshell Google Privacy Settlement Undisclosed
Most Read
-
-
Apr 07 2013
-
Written by PLP News
In a sensational case that has reportedly “grabbed the attention…
-
-
-
Mar 31 2013
-
Written by PLP News
A DLA Piper associate’s e-mail stating “that bill shall know…
-
-
-
Jan 26 2014
-
Written by PLP News
A 55-year-old attorney at White & Case, who recently filed…
-
-
-
Jun 15 2014
-
Written by Tami Kamin Meyer
More than 1.2 million applications, or “apps,” are available at…
-