Estimated reading time: 0 minutes, 42 seconds

Court Requires Journalist to Testify in Classified Info Leak Case

A federal appeals court last week issued a ruling that's likely to have a big impact on investigative journalism when it comes to national security matters. So The New York Times reports.

The First Amendment does not protect reporters who receive unauthorized leaks from being forced to testify against the people suspected of leaking to them, the court ruled. The court issued the holding—which rejected the argument made by "friend of the court" briefs filed by more than 24 media organizations arguing in favor of a qualified reporter’s privilege—in the context of determining that a full-time New York Times reporter must testify in the criminal trial of a former Central Intelligence Agency official charged with providing classified information that the reporter used in his 2006 book, State of War.

Read the full article from The New York Times here.

Read 4040 times
Rate this item
(0 votes)

Visit other PMG Sites:

PMG360 is committed to protecting the privacy of the personal data we collect from our subscribers/agents/customers/exhibitors and sponsors. On May 25th, the European's GDPR policy will be enforced. Nothing is changing about your current settings or how your information is processed, however, we have made a few changes. We have updated our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy to make it easier for you to understand what information we collect, how and why we collect it.