The judge in the case had said ahead of the ruling it would be thrown out if the jury had, in fact, sided with Palin since she failed or prove the paper’s malice. It is unclear if Palin and her legal team will appeal the decision.
Estimated reading time: 0 minutes, 29 seconds
Judge: I Would Have Rejected Verdict if Jury Sided with Sarah Palin in NYT Case
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s libel case against The New York Times was unsuccessful after a jury found the newspaper did not maliciously damage her reputation by “erroneously linking her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting.” So reports the Associated Press.
Latest from Progressive Law Practice
- California Drivers No Longer Need To Answer Cop’s Question
- Iowa Ban On LGBTQ+ Books Largely Blocked Ahead Of Enactment
- Michael Cohen's Legal Defense Included Non-existent Cases Invented By Google Bard: Report
- Hershey Sued For False Advertising Over 'Cute' Holiday Candy
- Terms Of Bombshell Google Privacy Settlement Undisclosed
Most Read
-
-
Apr 07 2013
-
Written by PLP News
In a sensational case that has reportedly “grabbed the attention…
-
-
-
Mar 31 2013
-
Written by PLP News
A DLA Piper associate’s e-mail stating “that bill shall know…
-
-
-
Jan 26 2014
-
Written by PLP News
A 55-year-old attorney at White & Case, who recently filed…
-
-
-
Jun 15 2014
-
Written by Tami Kamin Meyer
More than 1.2 million applications, or “apps,” are available at…
-