The Virginia Supreme Court held that, based on DNA evidence that failed to identify Harward’s genetic profile in sperm left at the crime scene, Harward did not kill Jesse Perron or rape Perron’s wife in 1982. Harward’s conviction was based, in large part, on expert testimony matching his teeth to the bite marks on the rape victim’s leg. Courts still consider bite-mark evidence, but its reliability is controversial.
Estimated reading time: 0 minutes, 32 seconds
Man Wrongly Convicted of Rape, Murder Released After Serving 33 Years
Most Read
-
-
Apr 07 2013
-
Written by PLP News
-
-
-
Mar 31 2013
-
Written by PLP News
-
-
-
Feb 08 2014
-
Written by Administrator
-
-
-
Jan 26 2014
-
Written by PLP News
-