So Reuters reports.
The court issued the holding while deciding that certain of prominent appropriation artist Richard Prince's works did not infringe on plaintiff Patrick Cariou's photographs of Rastafarians in Jamaica.
Included in the works that the court classified as protected “were those that manifested ‘an entirely different aesthetic from Cariou's photographs,’ in that Cariou's were serene images in nature while Prince's were ‘jarring ... hectic and provocative,’” according to Reuters.
Read the full Reuters article here.
Richard Prince's show at the Guggenheim (Photo credit: thefuturistics)